Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Bengasi :King David style hit on Ambassador Stevens

More of my thoughts on the ambassador stevens incident. As I see it: This was a King David style hit on the ambassador just like King David did to Bathsheba's husband. In both cases our man was put in the area of highest fighting and the other people pulled back leaving our man to die. Just like with King David this was done to cover the king's sin up so nobody would know. With this theory in mind the facts come into place. Establish the cover story: here we have the pre 9.11.2012 apology out of now where about a video supposedly offensive to muslims that nobody there had yet seen or herd of. Having our egyptian embassy do this ensures that the right people would hear the apology. Then have our ambassador go to the area of Libia where the fighting is the greatest..Bengasi. Have the state department pull the american security detail replacing them with alquieda/musulim brotherhood friendly security armed with billyclubs. Given the instructions of warn them and run away. Now just like King David did, we have our man left to die at the hands of our enemy. Complete this with real time video of the hit, which 2 different news reports have CIA people claim happened, and we can understand why our president could go to sleep after hearing (seeing) the news. Like King David to him his troubles were taken care of, the evidence and the witness were gone. For weeks afterwords we let anybody run through the ambassadors compound, possibly to allow the evidence to be removed..recall that CNN waltzed through the compound days later and found Ambassador Stevens diary on the floor while most of the other documentation is gone. CBS News’ Sharyl Attkisson asked the obvious question yesterday: If we could fly an unarmed drone over the consulate while it was under attack, why didn’t we send the military in to rescue our people? Some lawmakers are asking why U.S. military help from outside Libya didn’t arrive as terrorists battered more than 30 Americans over the course of more than seven hours. The assault was launched by an armed mob of dozens that torched buildings and used rocket propelled grenades, mortars and AK-47 rifles. CBS News has been told that, hours after the attack began, an unmanned Predator drone was sent over the U.S. mission in Benghazi, and that the drone and other reconnaissance aircraft apparently observed the final hours of the protracted battle. The State Department, White House and Pentagon declined to say what military options were available. A White House official told CBS News that, at the start of the attack, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta “looked at available options, and the ones we exercised had our military forces arrive in less than 24 hours, well ahead of timelines laid out in established policies.” But it was too late to help the Americans in Benghazi. The ambassador and three others were dead. --BY ALLAHPUNDIT-- According to Reuters, the guards patrolled with flashlights and batons, not guns; multiple British government sources told the authors of the story that they’d never heard of Blue Mountain, even though it’s based in the UK. Supposedly, State skimped on hiring a more established firm because they didn’t know how long they’d have a presence in Benghazi and didn’t want to hire full-timers who they might then have to find a position for later. That’s how you end up with your “guards” hiding on the roof — or maybe even lending the bad guys a hand — instead of defending vulnerable Americans inside. That’s who Chris Stevens had in his corner. Let’s see who was in the other corner: The founder of Libya’s Islamist militia Ansar al-Sharia was at the U.S. consulate compound during the deadly attack here, Libyan officials say, but he remains free a week after those allegations were disclosed to Libyan political leaders and U.S. investigators in Tripoli. Ahmed Abu Khattalah—who current Libyan officials and former Islamic militants describe as propagating an al Qaeda-style ideology—was seen during the Sept. 11 attack at the diplomatic mission where two of the four Americans died, said two senior Libyan security officials familiar with the investigation… “There’s no doubt the sheik was there,” said one of these officials, referring to the religious title Mr. Abu Khattalah’s followers use for him. “If the sheik was there, then the sheik was giving commands. That’s how the group operates.” Some Libyan witnesses have traveled to Tripoli at their own expense to talk to the FBI, but “three of these witnesses say the Americans have offered them no protection in exchange for their cooperation, prompting two of them to say they are trying to dissuade other Libyans from talking to the bureau.” So there’s your “spontaneous protest” update of the day, replete with added irony: According to the Journal, Ansar al-Sharia, while denying any involvement, has itself been busy using the “spontaneous protest” defense to claim that the attack on the consulate was some sort of grassroots reaction to the Mohammed film. The White House’s lame, discarded spin is now the de facto alibi of the likely culprits.

No comments:

Post a Comment